I comment on aol news stories, and they wont get posted1
When I post a comment on an news article, they are only posted for half a second and then disappear, what can be done? AOL told me to contact you, that you could help.
Images and some comments will be flagged in our system prior to becoming public. Here are some reasons why your comments may be flagged:
- Language (Examples may include: all caps, inappropriate words, etc.)
- Suspicious IP
- Any Image In order to create the best possible experience for everyone, we request that you abide by the AOL Community Guidelines, our core code of conduct, in all of your activities on AOL Services.
For more information, please view our community guidelines: http://legal.aol.com/community_guidelines/
-
Anonymous commented
AOL is once again siding with the left wing posters. they are allowed to use derogatory words but if a conservative uses the same word in a sentence, not calling anyone by that word, we get censored. That is not freedom of speech that is plain old censorship!
-
CAROL WALLACE commented
When you present such an argumentative headline that millions see as inaccurate because of what we normal law-abiding citizens see as an outrage in the cities today, you should put a high priority on fixing your Comments Section at the end of your story. Looting, fires, swearing at innocent folks walking or having dinner out, the cancel culture stuff...needs to be called out, so please allow your readers to do so.
-
Anonymous commented
Bring back the comment section
-
Raahoo commented
AOL... ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING!
ANOTHER POST REJECTED FOR ABSOLUTELY NO REASON!
Good point, Ray...
Humanity among humans = "nonsense" ... !Well no wonder we're so messed up...
We're trying to establish "nonsense" in America!
What good can that ever accomplish?
It certainly will never make Amercuh great!p.s. I'd love to see the statistics you're referring to showing 80% of commercial have black actors. Without that I can't say for certain... but I'll take a WAG and say it's a big, hot, steaming pile of male bovine excrement!
-
Raahoo commented
CHECK IT OUT...
HOW MANY COMPLAINTS HAVE I FILED?
ANSWER... DOZENS!!!HOW MANY HAS AOL RESPONDED TO?
ANSWER... ONE...AND THAT WAS NOT TO TELL ME IT WAS RESOLVED, OR EVEN REVIEWED...
BUT SIMPLY IT WAS MOVED TO ANOTHER LOCATION FOR SOME REASON... WHATEVER THE HELL THAT MEANS!
WHY DO YOU NOT EVER... EVER... EVER RESPOND TO MY COMPLAINTS...???
COWARDS!!!
AND YOU CLAIM YOUR CUSTOMERS ARE IMPORTANT...
BULL SHIT!! -
Raahoo commented
SO NOW YOU'RE SO TIRED OF MY COMPLAINTS THAT YOU'RE LABELING THEM ALL "DUPLICATE"???
HERE'S A NOVEL IDEA...
TRY ADDRESSING MY **** COMPLAINTS INSTEAD OF IGNORING OR DEFLECTING THEM...
AND I WON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT!I PAY WHAT I CONSIDER TO BE A FAIR AMOUNT FOR THE "PRIVILEGE" OF USING AOL...
BUT UNLESS I SEE SOME RESULTS FROM MY **** COMPLAINTS... I MAY HAVE TO LOOK ELSEWHERE FOR MY INTERNET NEEDS... IT'S NOT LIKE I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER ALTERNATIVES! -
Anonymous commented
feedback after stories..why not?
-
Raahoo commented
SERIOUSLY... THERE'S ONLY ONE WAY TO DESCRIBE WHAT YOU DO... AND THAT IS "DISGUSTING!" WHY?
REJECTED... WHY?
Well, actually, Joel...
Kathleen is basically right...!While the "USA Today" said the Democratic convention, "wasn’t exactly a barn burner," those first night viewing numbers did in fact beat out the number of first night viewers of the Republican convention, which presented Republican leaders and surrogates the "USA Today" said, "lived in a fantasy world with no one able to tell Trump the obvious truth!" Hmmm...!!!
According to Axios;
"Roughly 18.7 million people watched the first night of the Democratic National Convention," while...
"Roughly 17 million people watched the first night of the Republican National Convention" ... 13% lower than Democratic viewers!Both conventions lost first night viewership from 2016;
The DNC was down about 17%, and 26% for the RNC.So who, Joel, is actually the... "HAHAHAHAHHAHA LIAR?"
Sorry, redundant question! -
Edward49 commented
I can't comment on Aol Articles. Is it no longer allowed.
-
Anonymous commented
Stop shutting out comments that don't support AOL'S
political agenda! -
Anonymous commented
You are restricting the things you profess to admire. Way to go down the road to tatalitarianism.
-
Raahoo commented
DO I EVEN HAVE TO MENTION HOW INAPPROPRIATE THIS COMMENT (DIRECTED TO ME) IS? AND EVEN WORSE, HOW INAPPROPRIATE IT IS THAT AOL HAS ALLOWED IT TO REMAIN ON THE BOARD?
NOT THAT ANYONE IS SO SURPRISED ABOUT THAT, SINCE YOUR 'COMMUNITY GUIDELINES' ARE SO RANDOM AND VAGUE... AS IS YOUR ACTUAL OVERSIGHT OF THE CIVILITY YOU ALLOW ON YOUR BOARD SO RANDOM AND VAGUE...!!!
AS ALWAYS... THIS IDEA/COMPLAINT IS NOT ABOUT THE INAPPROPRIATENESS OF THE COMMENT ITSELF... BUT Y'ALL ALREADY KNOW THAT !
Awwwwww....... poor little boohoo....... he / she gets all triggered when someone dares to say anything about him / her, and throws a little hissy fit. Too bad...... I guess you'll just have to grow out of it. Did mean old AOL block some of your rants to me. I'm sure you think you have me all shook up, and cowering in a corner. And I guess come to think of it...... my name does kinda' fit as far as you're concerned. I was toting an M16 and fighting for your rights before you were probably even born. So, I guess I was in UNIFORM, when you were still in LIQUID form........ too bad you're the one that made it to the egg! LOL!!!!!!!!
-
LouAnn commented
We may or may not agree with comments. However they still provide others thoughts. We should be the ones to make the decision to delete-
-
Raahoo commented
AOL POSTS THIS CAUTION TO PENDING POSTS;
"Sure about this? Your post seems to include language which may be considered inappropriate in our community."
ALTHOUGH THE FOLLOWING POST WAS NOT REJECTED BECAUSE OF "LANGUAGE WHICH MAY BE CONSIDERED INAPPROPRIATE IN OUR COMMUNITY..." BECAUSE THERE IS NO OBJECTIONABLE LANGUAGE IN THE POST... IT'S SIMPLY BECAUSE AOL IS TOO COWARDLY TO ALLOW OPEN AND CIVIL DISCOURSE TO OCCUR ON "THEIR" CONVERSATION BOARD!
ALTHOUGH THEY PANDER TO THEIR CUSTOMERS BY SAYING "YOUR OPINIONS ARE IMPORTANT!" BULL HOCKEY PUCKS!
GET REAL!One of the first "salutes" I ever saw our “Great President” give, Chris...
Was the Nazi salute!That's not a made-up deflection to support an agenda... it's a true, first-hand observation... He walked onstage at one of his early ego rallies and gave that vile signal to his adoring minions... who cheered him on!!! Disgusting!
And there was no mistaking it for a "Hi, good to see you, thanks for showing up," kind of wave! It was a full on, straight arm and wrist, palm down, fingers flat, straight and together... all at a formal 45-degree angle! The only thing missing from the scene was the little black mustache and the chant, "Sieg Heil!"
That was in 2015, before... I'd assume... his 'handlers' told him to knock it off before the rest of America caught on to his deplorable message!
So, I'd say, make sure The unChosen One gets his walking papers before he has the audacity or the chance to make that salute from the steps of our White House or Capitol building!
But then... I wouldn't expect any of y'all to recognize the danger of any of that!
'Cause you have your heads stuck so far in the sand, denying, deflecting, attacking, and lying! -
Raahoo commented
COMMENT REJECTED!
NEED I SAY MORE?
EXCEPT TO ASK... WHY?Your comment cracks me up, Drunk guy [THAT'S NOT ME... THAT'S HIS SELF PROCLAIMED HANDLE!]... Just like your handle does... because that's exactly how much sense you make! But then... I get the feeling you're fine with that, and like it that way!
-
Raahoo commented
Y'ALL HAVE BECOME JUST ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING!
'NUFF SAID... BUT JUST FOR AN EXAMPLE OF THAT ACCUSATION... THE FOLLOWING POST WAS REJECTED! WHY?Where do you think, Denny... The term, "gone postal" came from... and why! Any idea? I can tell you from first-hand observation that the term came from the intense pressure many of the workers are put under as they do their job! Just one example... In the sorting rooms, where letters are sorted according to zip codes, the letters are fed by machinery past a human 'sorter' who must visually read the zip code (often just chicken scratch), and then enter the code into the mechanical sorting machine. The speed with which the letters pass in front of the sorter is dizzying! Think of the hilarious "I love Lucy" episode where Lucy and Ethel are wrapping chocolates passing by on a conveyor belt... and the chocolates pass faster... and faster... and... Lucy and Ethel just can't keep up! It's kind of like that in the Post Office... only it's not chocolates... it's mind dizzying and numbing monotony... and it goes on, and on, and on, until BANG... "He's gone postal!" But hey... it's just the "overtime culture" that need to change, right?
-
Raahoo commented
CONSISTENCY IS USUALLY CONSIDERED TO BE A GOOD THING!
HOWEVER, YOU AOL, SEEM TO HAVE AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE!
IN THE PAST, I HAVE REPEATEDLY INCLUDED GRAPHS AND CHARTS TO SUPPORT FACTS AND INFORMATION I'M POSTING, AND I REGULARLY SEE IMAGES AND GIFs, SOME OF WHICH ARE GROSS AND DISGUSTING... YET THEY ARE ALLOWED TO REMAIN ON THE BOARD. MY POINT IS NOT ABOUT THE IMAGES OR GIFs... IT'S WITH THE FACT THAT FOR SOME REASON, I'M NO LONGER ALLOWED TO INCLUDE GRAPHS OR CHARTS TO SUPPORT THE INFORMATION IN MY POSTS... AND THE ENTIRE POST IS SUMMARILY REJECTED WITHOUT EXPLANATION!
AS I SAID... MY "IDEA/COMPLAINT" IS NOT ABOUT THE IMAGES THEMSELVES... IT'S ABOUT THE INCONSISTENCY AND HYPOCRISY ON YOUR PART!! -
Raahoo commented
YOUR INTEGRITY AND CREDIBILITY, AOL...
IS GOING STRAIGHT DOWN THE TOILET!THE FOLLOWING IS A RESPONSE TO SOMEONE WHO REGULARLY POSTS OBVIOUS, INTENTIONAL, AND DANGEROUS LIES AND ACCUSATIONS, YET YOU REJECT THIS SIMPLE, TRUTHFUL, AND WELL DESERVED RESPONSE... GO FIGURE!!!
Classic deflection and transference, Scott...
All in one ridiculous rant... Way to go!AND BECAUSE OF THIS STOOOPID REJECTION, I'M BLOCKED ONCE AGAIN FROM PARTICIPATING ON THE BOARD!
-
PAUL MARISH commented
Every comment gets rejected even if I copy word for word someone elses that has been accepted.
-
Raahoo commented
ANOTHER PIECE OF HYPOCRITICAL MONITORING BS FROM AOL!!
IF ALLOW ONE PERSON TO THROW INSULTS AT ANOTHER... ME!... IT SEEMS RATHER IRRATIONAL AND HYPOCRITICAL TO NOT LET ME THROW A SOMEWHAT INTELLIGENT INSULT BACK AT THEM... YOU CAN'T HAVE IT ONE WAY, BUT NOT THE OTHER... BUT THEN I GUESS THAT KIND OF LOGIC DOESN'T FIT INTO YOUR SMALL BOX COMMUNITY GUIDELINES!Typical, deflective, impotent comment from an uneducated minion...
Nuff said!
And the only thing I'll thank him for is getting out of our White House in January!
Although I doubt he'll do even that like an adult!