GARBAGE PROGRAMMING FAULTS IN NEW VERSION OF SOFTWARE and useless means of contact
Response to the below email.
I don't use Twitter ( too many poor quality exchanges) or Facebook ( privacy issues), so if you wish to get the information you suggest you might like, in the below message, and in the related reply sent simultaneously, just provide a proper email address and case numbers etc. for the exchanges.
ie - the Old Ways do work. = Your innovations are valueless. And your long term policies of blocking contact and minimising support are now "reaping their reward"?
---- Forwarded message -----
From: AOL no-reply+aol@feedback-poweredby.uservoice.com
To: "asbeesley@compuserve.com" asbeesley@compuserve.com
Sent: Wednesday, 4 October 2023 at 01:14:10 BST
Subject: AOL has updated the status of an idea you support!
Hi,
We wanted to let you know that an idea you supported has a new status. Let us know what you think!
STATUS UPDATE
Idea: GARBAGE PROGRAMMING FAULTS IN NEW VERSION OF SOFTWARE
no status → Support Request
Hi there,
I'd like to look into this and I need additional details from you to properly address your concern/issue. Please contact us at @AOLSupportHelp on Twitter, AOL Customer Care page on Facebook or at help.aol.com
Looking forward to your reply!
Thank you,
AOL Mail Team
ASBeesley .
shared this idea
-
ASBeesley .
commented
AND HERE IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE
Go to a suggested sign in on an open comments page ( on which I believe I was actually signed in,) click to submit, and you get
BEGINS
← Customer Feedback for AOL
(Private) New AOL MailSorry, you don't have access to this forum.
Your email address does not have access to this forum. (Sign out)AOL · Terms · Feedback Posting Guidelines · Privacy · Remove my feedback
ENDS
-
ASBeesley .
commented
And let me add: the first time I tried to post this, the software wanted me to sign in - when I already was signed in. Suitable Example , yes? How can code run 2 different ways in a 5 minute period?