Skip to content

Autoblog

← Customer Feedback for AOL


This forum is for you to make suggestions and provide thoughtful feedback about our content and services. We’re always trying to improve and we can use the most popular feedback to make a positive change! The more specific your feedback, the more useful for us. While we can’t respond to every suggestion, we review regularly and take them very seriously. So please, tell us how we can improve your Autoblog experience.*

If you have videos, photos, ideas, etc. for a future story, please visit our Tips page.


How can we improve Autoblog?

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

1 result found

  1. Car Finder Filter suggestion: Style or Type

    Split Style or Type category into 2 categories (maybe Body Type and Style) and make the selection as ANY checked options so that a search could be run, for example, for luxury SUV, crossover and wagons.

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Research Tools  ·  Admin →
    Declined  ·  Stephen Rouse responded

    We’ve reviewed this request and have found that the format in which we receive data creates some complications. When we built our Car Finder experience, we looked at style and type and decided to use an “all” check so users could find SUVs that were also luxury or Crossovers that were also luxury. Unfortunately, users can’t find SUVs and Crossovers that are Luxury. We had to make a choice based on that data format. If we can get that formatting changed, we’ll revisit this suggestion. Thanks again.

  • Don't see your idea?

Autoblog

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)