The only "Policy Guildline" that AOL should foster is one of truth telling
The "censors" that review posts are so inconsistent with their approval and reject decisions- with only a vague statement as to the reason for a reject. The rationale should only be based upon civility, truthfulness, and not the personal political views and bias of the reviewer. Ample examples and comments show that this is a universal and unwarranted practice by your reviewers. Your journalistic integrity is compromised with such actions..
798th
ranked
Richard Encapera
shared this idea