AOL.com
This forum is for you to make product suggestions and provide thoughtful feedback. We’re always trying to improve our products and we can use the most popular feedback to make a positive change!
This forum is not monitored for any support-related issues. If you need assistance of any kind, please visit our help site.
Tell us how we can improve AOL. The more specific your feedback, the more useful for us. While we can’t respond to every suggestion, we review regularly and take them very seriously.
2516 results found
-
Restricted access?
I have to wonder why I am unable to access the responses to my comments on the Rush Limbaugh story. For that matter, I can no longer access the comments there at all: from other stories I can see that there have been responses and likes, but clicking them leads to a version of the article without open comments available. Good job, AOL. Keep it up and you will find yourselves restricted.
4645th ranked -
news
When am I going to be allowed to post to news articles again?
4645th ranked -
Black or white?
I continue to be confused by your divisive journalism by listing a Black individual (capitalized), yet if the person is white...you seem to carry it as lower case. Both merit the same gravity (as, perhaps, should asian, hispanic, etc). Quit falling prey to political correctness with the "concern of the day"
4645th ranked -
Obama are you kidding me??? ha aha how disperte are you?
wake up and give us positive stories!!!
276th ranked -
Most of your news stories are lies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Stop it!
Your news spread lies about the President of the United States. How do you sleep at night. I've had aol from the beginning. I'm about to leave and go to gmail. Just tell the true stories and you will be fine. Stop lying.
1239th ranked -
PLEASE PUT THE ******* PAUSE BUTTON BACK IN THE NEWS FEED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HEADLINES MOVE TO FAST, I HAVE TO KEEP MOVING BACK TO READ THE WHOLE THING. NEED THE PAUSE OPTION BACK.
1695th ranked -
11528th ranked
-
Is this feedback section the paper shredder of the internet?
I see thousands upon thousands of your customers complaining about the same issue about your choices of news headlines. Not only that but comments censoring as well curiously only towards right leaning users. But yes you are morally above anyone who has a different political opinion than you do therefore they don't deserve to have a voice. We'll still all be here whether you like it or not. Have fun ignoring your feedback section.
4645th ranked -
Yet again Trump is the main news headline.
He's not running the country anymore. Also why no comments allowed on news stories like this https://www.aol.com/finance/why-rich-people-leaving-california-130327184.html or this https://www.aol.com/news/raskin-trump-found-guilty-court-150500682.html
Seems like you want to hear from your readers about Republicans but not Democrats. Its censorship at its most pathetic. Too afraid of what the public has to say about Democrats? I wonder why that is. Is it because they all stink and that would reveal the truth?
4645th ranked -
Stop being so Anti-trump, Stop filling your news with so many loops and advertising. I pay for your services not your propaganda!
Stop being so Anti-trump, Stop filling your news with so many loops and advertising. I pay for your services not your propaganda!
276th ranked -
The Evidence for Massive Cheating in Swing States (Democrat Controlled)
We are hearing many reports of election tampering, but the big problem is that the "democrat operatives did not have enough time to "change or add votes" for the down ballot candidates. That's why the democrats will not take the senate and the house is gaining almost all of the 2018 lost seats to the democrats. How are we supposed to believe this presidential election is legitimate, when all the evidence points to Trump winning. He has more non-white votes that any Republican Presidential candidate in 60 years. The democrat governors STOPPED COUNTING VOTES IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT…
2623rd ranked -
Biden Roasts Trump?
Biden doesn’t have enough of a mind left to “roast” anyone! He might have read or rehearsed a line that someone gave to him, but let’s see how they do one on one without an electronic device imbedded in Biden’s ear. But no, you lefties will try to hide him until the election!!!!!
605th ranked -
Stop being so liberal with your news. It is sickening to see this from a news organization. How about being fair once in awhile.
Change your editor.
4645th ranked -
Stop referencing Twitter feeds for videos that don't populate!
Stop referencing Twitter feeds for videos that don't populate and can't been played or seen! I'm not a Twitter user and don't plan to be, you are alienating loyal AOL users. :(
4645th ranked -
Hey china joe, Where's the dough for the American citizens, WE GET SERVED FIRST . . . .
Hey china joe, Where's the dough for the American citizens, WE GET SERVED FIRST . . . .
4645th ranked -
stop being anti our President....be fair, be news-worthy not "not-worthy"
it would be nice for AOL news to cease being anti-our President.
be "news-WORTHY" not "NOT WORTHY"309th ranked -
BE HONEST
Your current #4 News story Headline exclaims " U.S. To Send More Federal Troops to 3 U.S. Cities". Could AOL please tell us what branch or branches will be deployed? Are they Marines, Army, Navy, Air Force, or Coast Guard?? Maybe they are boy scouts or girl scouts ! The article from Reuters (very anti-American source by the way) tells us they are "agents". But as usual, the biased headlines capture ones attention, even if the story is not read in its entirety...thus leaving a totally false information on the viewer. But that is AOL's intention anyway eh? To deceive…
740th ranked -
you censor "stupid" but not "mentally impaired" when speaking of crooked politicians, why
STOP CENSORING on a politically correct basis!
4645th ranked -
No more comments!!
Do what Yahoo.com did and STOP ALLOWING PEOPLE TO COMMENT. All of Yahoo's racist are now on your site and it makes your site look terrible.
4645th ranked -
Explain rejecting comments
My comments are articulate, not bigoted, or obscene, and aside from an occasional sarcasm, they are normally informative and civil, often containing reference and source details ... but when the content doesn't favor the Left, they are rejected. I don't know what was "offensive." How can I not make the same mistake again, if your moderators don't explain what that offense was? If you can't tell me specifically WHAT the offense was, then I shouldn't be penalized.
2623rd ranked
- Don't see your idea?