Stop screwing up working versions just for the sake of change
You don't need to keep adding new things, because you keep screwing up old things in the process. The email used to work reliably; now random parts of a conversation go to spam, and the search function fails to find half of the things that include the search term. YOUR AI DOES NOT WORK RIGHT so stop forcing it on us until you get it right.
-
Lyle Straube commented
Old look and the way it worked was much better. Your new way stinks!
-
Nicholas Bell
commented
I want to see more lines in my email inbox. Why have you changed it?
-
colin jones commented
Absolutely dreadful. There it was this morning, (25/09/26) and no longer gives you the option to use the old format. Hate it. Horrible to use, but do AOL actually care what we think...the users? Of course not. They probably don't even read these comments. They couldn't care less. We DO as we are told. If it's not broke, don't fix it.
-
Cathie Bo
commented
hate new cartoonist look.. want to be able to use classic view
-
Cynthia Vengraitis
commented
Ive been with AOL since the start, but this may change if I can't get the original version back.
-
HARLEY WEST
commented
to much spam i'm already at 1000 you raised my rates why not fix your problems
-
Sunji Sunji
commented
1. Please stop with the email view upgrades. Obviously people are satisfied with original format which is why they are still with you. The new format is horrible and not mobile phone friendly. Some people dont have the capabilities to download as an app. Please give an option to go back to classic view. 2. The advertising is overwhelming. Please dont compromise your integrity and ethics by resorting to having people pay to not have ads. Its destroying these platforms that once were ad free and the reason why people use it because of this. 3. PLEASE ALLOW FULL DISPLAY OF EMAIL THREAD INFORMATION. When I reply to an email, the reocrd should be displayed and not in short cut, e.g. TO, FROM, TIME, DATE, SUB. This helps if someone is trying to track record or file the email for documentation purposes. I dont see the logic in omitting this information in the email thread. 4. FIX when you review old emails and delete or move that it goes back to where you last were instead of back to the beginning where you have to click the arrow button just to get to the year or date you are trying to view. Thank you and I appreciate any consideration to reevaluate the aforementioned.
-
JOSEPH SARACINO
commented
please change
-
JOSEPH SARACINO
commented
go back to old aol mail presentation, I cannot see stock market results on opening screen, I cannot see Sprts results on opening screen very disappointing to have to open other windows to get what was automatic
-
KATHARINE ALMIRALL
commented
I liked when my emails loaded faster, I have to get through a lot of them and this slower loading wastes my time. Thank you.
-
JOHN COREY
commented
Presently AOL is difficult to use, is not user friendly and disappears before it can be read or analyzed. WHY? In it's original version AOL was the hall mark of how e-mail should work; simple and clear presentation allowing the user to decide on the 'next' step in it's future. Please return AOL e-mail to the original version.
-
JOHN COREY
commented
How long does it take to process ideas?
-
JOHN COREY
commented
Presently AOL is difficult to use, is not user friendly and disappears before it can be read or analyzed. WHY? In it's original version AOL was the hall mark of how e-mail should work; simple and clear presentation allowing the user to decide on the 'next' step in it's future. Please return AOL e-mail to the original version.
-
JOHN COREY
commented
Presently AOL is difficult to use, is not user friendly and disappears before it can be read or analyzed. WHY? In it's original version AOL was the hall mark of how e-mail should work; simple and clear presentation allowing the user to decide on the 'next' step in it's future. Please return AOL e-mail to the original version.
-
JOHN COREY
commented
Presently AOL is difficult to use, is not user friendly and disappears before it can be read or analyzed. WHY? In it's original version AOL was the hall mark of how e-mail should work; simple and clear presentation allowing the user to decide on the 'next' step in it's future. Please return AOL e-mail to the original version.
-
DEANNA DEREMO
commented
STILL NOT FIXED!!
UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -
JOHN COREY
commented
Presently AOL is difficult to use, is not user friendly and disappears before it can be read or analyzed. WHY? In it's original version AOL was the hall mark of how e-mail should work; simple and clear presentation allowing the user to decide on the 'next' step in it's future. Please return AOL e-mail to the original version.
-
JOHN COREY
commented
Presently AOL is difficult to use, is not user friendly and disappears before it can be read or analyzed. WHY? In it's original version AOL was the hall mark of how e-mail should work; simple and clear presentation allowing the user to decide on the 'next' step in it's future. Please return AOL e-mail to the original version.
-
DEANNA DEREMO
commented
STILL NOT FIXED.
UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!! UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!! UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!! UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!! UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!! UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!! UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!! UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!! UNLIMITED SPAM BLOCKING!!!!!!!
-
Barbara Sauber commented
Return the older version