E WINFIELD WASHINGTON
My feedback
8 results found
-
4162nd ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment E WINFIELD WASHINGTON
commented
You still haven't corrected the problem. With much consistency whatever ahole is dealing doesn't deal meld to all players. It only deals meld to computer bots so they have in excess of 50 meld while live players only get 20 or 30, if they are luck. Why can't you fix this nonsense. It renders this game without any level of integrity.
E WINFIELD WASHINGTON
shared this idea
·
-
1488th rankedE WINFIELD WASHINGTON
supported this idea
·
-
525th rankedE WINFIELD WASHINGTON
supported this idea
·
-
1488th rankedE WINFIELD WASHINGTON
supported this idea
·
-
525th rankedE WINFIELD WASHINGTON
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment E WINFIELD WASHINGTON
commented
Critical facts: 1) I have been playing pinochle for over 50 yrs and still have all my faculties about me. 2) Yes I do count cards.3) Generally I play with 3 computer players b/c live players have the tendancy to leave one questioning whether they are playing the game or with themself.4) I have played pinochle online with other platforms, which are no longer operating.
I have noticed after having played this version of pinochle renegging on the part of the computer opponents. There are only 4 aces per suite yet the computer opponent will play a 5th. Computer opponents have played a 21st card in a suite which throws the game into chaos.
Meld is NOT distributed equally amongst all players. Generally the opponents average meld is greater than 50 whereas my computer partner and I average a meld less than 50. This is unheard of on a consistent basis unless there is a silent monitor overseeing the game.
Because of these inadequacies I refer to that silent monitor as FUNKY F(A)RTS as their silent participation stinks up the play and it is the more appropriate than violating your TOS policy.
Your TOS policy is one-sided. The reason one plays games here is for entertainment. The kind of entertainment which is enjoyable. Having to deal with inept play on the part of the computer opponents, the silent monitor, and my own computer partner, who doesn't recognize the play on the board nor knows how to bid, in no way. shape, or form results in "enjoyable entertainment. TOS should bode both ways. You need to provide 'enjoyable entertainment' which would easily negate inappropriate discussions in the comments.
I look forward to hearing from you. -
4162nd rankedE WINFIELD WASHINGTON
shared this idea
·
-
4162nd rankedE WINFIELD WASHINGTON
shared this idea
·
-
1488th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment E WINFIELD WASHINGTON
commented
Critical facts: 1) I have been playing pinochle for over 50 yrs and still have all my faculties about me. 2) Yes I do count cards.3) Generally I play with 3 computer players b/c live players have the tendancy to leave one questioning whether they are playing the game or with themself.4) I have played pinochle online with other platforms, which are no longer operating.
I have noticed after having played this version of pinochle renegging on the part of the computer opponents. There are only 4 aces per suite yet the computer opponent will play a 5th. Computer opponents have played a 21st card in a suite which throws the game into chaos.
Meld is NOT distributed equally amongst all players. Generally the opponents average meld is greater than 50 whereas my computer partner and I average a meld less than 50. This is unheard of on a consistent basis unless there is a silent monitor overseeing the game.
Because of these inadequacies I refer to that silent monitor as FUNKY F(A)RTS as their silent participation stinks up the play and it is the more appropriate than violating your TOS policy.
Your TOS policy is one-sided. The reason one plays games here is for entertainment. The kind of entertainment which is enjoyable. Having to deal with inept play on the part of the computer opponents, the silent monitor, and my own computer partner, who doesn't recognize the play on the board nor knows how to bid, in no way. shape, or form results in "enjoyable entertainment. TOS should bode both ways. You need to provide 'enjoyable entertainment' which would easily negate inappropriate discussions in the comments.
I look forward to hearing from you.E WINFIELD WASHINGTON
supported this idea
·
You consistently demand that one acknowledge your terms of service, however b/c you ignore the complaints submitted to you, you won't acknowledge that the players of these games expect a higher level of integrity in the games and thus render you dumbfounded except to demand one acknowledge your terms of service. All the while your IGNORE your responsibility to providing the kind of integrity required of the game. Get back to me!!!!!!