13 results found

1. Monitisation strategy and CX

   I read an article on my mobile and you put a big box in the middle of the article explaining that it's exclusive content and I can either login or read more... Something like this. I click read more (I'm not a member yet) and the website redirect me to an faq page that explain everything but nothing about the fees (transparency issue... And I think... It's going to be expensive) . I click on the hamburger nav and I see a beautiful cta 'join extra crunch'. I click the cta and you redirect me to the faq page (and I now think... Why are they shy about their fees? Are they not confident about their service?) . So now I decide to go back to the article page click login and from there you direct me to a login page where I click on sign up. On the sign up page you are happy to take all my personal details without giving me information on the fees. So I give you all fake details and I put my dob like if I'm 16 years (mistake)... Now I cannot proceed because I'm under age... I give up.

   It is not easy to monitize but it seems that you make it even harder for me and you :)! UX... So obvious and so challanging. I hope to hear from you soon... Maybe I wasn't in a dead end but as it felt a primary red route on the article page that I was reading the CX was a bad... Shame it was an interesting article!

   I read an article on my mobile and you put a big box in the middle of the article explaining that it's exclusive content and I can either login or read more... Something like this. I click read more (I'm not a member yet) and the website redirect me to an faq page that explain everything but nothing about the fees (transparency issue... And I think... It's going to be expensive) . I click on the hamburger nav and I see a beautiful cta 'join extra crunch'. I click the cta and you redirect me to the faq page (and… more

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  Feature Request  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Biased Articles Of Indian Editorial Staff

   Hi
   I am writing this to inform you about the biased articles of Indian tech crunch website especially the author Manish Singh.For example he wrote a article* in the context of Indian prime minister tweeting of giving up all social media accounts without any additional details.In this article he is shamelessly showing his hate for the prime minister.Being critical of govt is good for democracy especially for journalist but writing such biased articles with blatant propaganda is surely harmful to credibility of Tech crunch website.If you read the article he mentions that PM is distancing from various issues and without providing any proof he says the govt is not fixing it.The PMO as well as other cabinet ministers account was still going to be active so how did he conclude the he is distancing himself from various issues.Also there was no need of the ending paragraph where the author mentions that it will bring peace to him as some of the people he follow incites violence.How did he come to that conclusion and how it is relevant to the context of the news?If you want to check his hate for the govt you can check his twitte* profile.

   Moreover recently the Indian govt launched its official app "Aarogya Setu" for tackling Covid-19.The application have over 20m+ downloads and still I find no mention of it in techcrunch India .The app with well thought out privacy policy has got good reviews and is garnering accolades for the Indian govt.As this author clearly hates the current Indian govt in his blind hate he decided not to write about it.This type of article by livemint* clearly should have been on your website as your motto is Startup and Technology news and certainly this article falls under this category.

   A simple google search with 'Techcrunch' keyword regarding all kind of technologies used by Indian govt to fight Covid-19 finds no mention on your website but your website mentions every technology used by Singapore govt like their official app "TraceTogether". Clearly Indian editorial version of techcrunch is biased.

   To be frank I rarely reads 'Techcrunch' but due to this author shameless propaganda I made sure to even unfollow 'Techcrunch' in my google feed.I hope that global editor team is not biased and have journalistic ethics still intact.I really hope you investigate this matter with utmost sincerity and maintain your reputation of giving good technology related articles.
   My only request to you is to investigate the Tech crunch India editorial staff for their biased articles especially the above mention editor.

   Ps: I really really hope the global editorial board is not taking 'Soros' money

   Thanks

   Links :
   1.https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/02/indias-prime-minister-narendra-modi-says-he-is-thinking-about-quitting-social-media/
   2.https://twitter.com/refsrc
   3.https://www.livemint.com/news/india/india-is-pinning-hopes-on-apps-in-virus-fight-11586447095280.html

   Hi
   I am writing this to inform you about the biased articles of Indian tech crunch website especially the author Manish Singh.For example he wrote a article* in the context of Indian prime minister tweeting of giving up all social media accounts without any additional details.In this article he is shamelessly showing his hate for the prime minister.Being critical of govt is good for democracy especially for journalist but writing such biased articles with blatant propaganda is surely harmful to credibility of Tech crunch website.If you read the article he mentions that PM is distancing from various issues and without… more

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  Editorial Feedback  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Subscription

   I subscribed to your EXTRA but nothing works?

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  Error  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/21/capella-space-reveals-new-satellite-design-for-real-time-control-of-high-resolution-earth-imaging/

   Cod-named "Sequoia" instead of "Code-Named" in the first paragraph.

   https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/21/capella-space-reveals-new-satellite-design-for-real-time-control-of-high-resolution-earth-imaging/

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  Editorial Feedback  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Smasung should be spelt Samsung

   Title article spelt wrong: https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/12/smasung-launches-the-rugged-enterprise-ready-galaxy-xcover-pro/

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  Error  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Poor-quality, nonsensical writing from people that clearly don't understand or have a background in technology.

   Whenever I read an article from Tech Crunch, I feel like I might as well just go to the relevant topic company's PR section and read a press release or white paper. There is absolutely no context or user-friendly, plainspoken, specific, detailed and researched article that your organization produces. The reason I can tell that the writers don't know what they are talking about and are just copy-and-pasting their articles from some PR department is they use the same Orwellian, opaque buzzwords that are so common in industry parlance. I yearn for the day Tech Crunch actually puts a writer on the beat that actually has a clue and a meaningful understanding of what they are writing about and can do so in a coherent way. Are they all English majors that are terrible at math and science? Are they just lazy? Are they secretly moonlighting for the companies they report on? They are essentially just dishonest ads.

   Whenever I read an article from Tech Crunch, I feel like I might as well just go to the relevant topic company's PR section and read a press release or white paper. There is absolutely no context or user-friendly, plainspoken, specific, detailed and researched article that your organization produces. The reason I can tell that the writers don't know what they are talking about and are just copy-and-pasting their articles from some PR department is they use the same Orwellian, opaque buzzwords that are so common in industry parlance. I yearn for the day Tech Crunch actually puts a writer… more

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  Editorial Feedback  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Maybe have someone proofread your articles before posting them

   You guys have 5th grade spelling errors in your online articles. I would be embarrassed to work there.

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. i have ideas that's will be helpful to improve your site

   hey i have ideas that's will be helpful for your site but i need little thing in return.
   Let me now if you are interested

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  Editorial Feedback  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Ask Catherine Shu to apologize to Richard Stallman for falsley accusing him of "Defending Jeffrey Epstein"

   Richard Stallman resigned recently after remarks he made on an MIT mailing list defending the cofounder of the MIT AI lab, Marvin Minsky. In that email he argued the semantics of statutory **** vs assault and in no way "defended Epstein". To make that statement is accusation inflation and misreports the facts of a terrible situation for all parties. Please correct this mistake by issuing an apology to Mr. Stallman and correcting the title of Catherine Shu's article.

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  Error  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Favicon

    The favicon has been gone for a few days now

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  Error  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. News API

    Include a 'News API' so people could Link your articles in various apps or websites. Would enable you to have far greater reach.

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  Feature Request  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Publish your journalistic code of ethics. Publish the email address of your public editor or publisher.

    Because this story makes your journalistic ethics suspect:

    https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/02/13-ways-to-*****-over-your-internet-provider/

    Your writer took a personal butt hurt and wrote a revenge piece on an entire industry.

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  Editorial Feedback  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Weekly Roundup Email - Low Editorial Quality

    I've been reading your Week in Review email for a long time now. It needs some editorial focus. The writing is consistently sloppy, with spelling and grammar mistakes throughout.

    The writing is poor too: The section "How did the top tech companies ***** up this week? This clearly needs its own section, in order of badness" for example. This section has appeared for 10+ weeks and it's again just lazy writing.

    In the past I've also seen broken images and this week the images were super-size. I love your content but you guys are big contenders now, and you can't be putting your name to content like this.

    I've been reading your Week in Review email for a long time now. It needs some editorial focus. The writing is consistently sloppy, with spelling and grammar mistakes throughout.

    The writing is poor too: The section "How did the top tech companies ***** up this week? This clearly needs its own section, in order of badness" for example. This section has appeared for 10+ weeks and it's again just lazy writing.

    In the past I've also seen broken images and this week the images were super-size. I love your content but you guys are big contenders now, and you can't… more

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  Editorial Feedback  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close