WHY is there no appeal process for rejecting commentary after some organize together to have a contradictory point of view expressed?
There are those who actively attempt to suppress the free expression of opposing points of view. They contact each other and organize to object to EVERY commentary of someone they disagree with. AOL apparently takes their objections without review and then AUTOMATICALLY rejects every commentary from that member simply because of the number of objections or reporting. I can see rejections WITH specific violations of the rules BUT not because some weak minded activists can't simply respond to that which they politically or socially disagree. Meanwhile, those are simply ignored continue to appear regularly in posts that are beyond offensive on many levels. We are not children in need of protection from opposing views. They can actually be ignored as they deserve to be.