AOL.com
This forum is for you to make product suggestions and provide thoughtful feedback. We’re always trying to improve our products and we can use the most popular feedback to make a positive change!
This forum is not monitored for any support-related issues. If you need assistance of any kind, please visit our help site.
Tell us how we can improve AOL. The more specific your feedback, the more useful for us. While we can’t respond to every suggestion, we review regularly and take them very seriously.
11818 results found
-
Will AOL let us comment after the mid-terms?
Pretend the "A" in AOL stands for America and all her rights.
4664th ranked -
Griner?????
Is Griner really your number one headline? Or, is it only because she is black and you are gatering to a specific segment of the population? Big mistake.
4664th ranked -
Sell AOL to Elon Musk.
Sell AOL to Elon Musk.
1246th ranked -
AOL just can't help itself. They just cannot post a decent picture of President Trump.
It only makes AOL look foolish. It looks like they would understand this.
4664th ranked -
Bias
Why do not you start covering Pres Biden? He is destroying America. Over $31 trillion in debt. He added 3.2 trillion in debt in 20 months. Just in 2022 2 million have crossed the southern illegally. The leftist cities are being destroyed by leftist mayors. Crime through the roof. You run stories that portray police as criminals and racists. You frame false narratives. You keep covering Trump who has not been President for almost 2 years. It is the mid-terms. Why don't you run stories on Senator Warnock who has major personal problems. AOL you are playing favorites and interfering…
4664th ranked -
AOL is one-sided (left WOKE agenda) regarding news stories it pushes on us!
AOL is pathetic. Their news stories, *****, photos, agenda, spin, whatever you want to call it are all but 100% WOKE. Get WOKE, go BROKE AOL. Hope your employees start to look for positions in other companies because your days are numbered. You can remedy this by bringing us unbiased news that we've been craving for years. Otherwise, bye bye!!!
1698th ranked -
STOP refusing to provide "Conversations" on some of your articles.
Why the heck is there no "conversations" section on this Ukraine article. We, your AOL members need to have the right to express our support for Ukraine.
4664th ranked -
Stop being so liberal !!! Never a bad thing about sleepy joe. Trump is not the President
Stop being so liberal. Nobody read your bs. Trump is not the president. Country is going to **** and u write about Jan 6 nobody cares
4664th ranked -
not a mention of Hunter Biden's issues...If this were a Trump issue, all **** would break loose.
Report the effing news!!
4664th ranked -
Stop deliberately sabotaging the email of your non-paying customers. It's extortion and only reinforces the conviction "No way in ****"
If you want to build a paying customer base then stop acting like an organized crime family. You deliberately sabotage the email of non-paying customers and then engage in extortion to fix the problem. EARTH TO VERIZON - THAT **** WON'T WORK.
4664th ranked -
Biden
Biden, when the history books are written about this man will note that he was a trator , he and his family sold out the country to the Chinese.
929th ranked -
The 12up ad you are currently running has the picture of an African American woman in handcuffs in from of an American Flag that is FALSE
TOO MANY FALSE AND OFFENSIVE ADS
2626th ranked -
Look at your censorship.
In your comments after news articles I seem to get censored for no reason. No profanity or bad words, just true facts. I just saw a comment and the user name YOU allowed is
FUCKJOEBIDEN
You should be ashamed for letting that fly and ridiculous censorship that does not violate community guidelines.4664th ranked -
4664th ranked
-
I do not want to see local politics on my entertainment site. Knowing that Stacey Abrams is running for any office is sickening enough.
I do not want to see local politics on my entertainment site. Looking at Stacey Abrams hawking her view is annoying enough, but I don't want to have to look at her when I sign onto AOL. For the first time since I have been on AOL, which I am guessing is 20 years or so, I am seriously considering dropping it, if you are going to push liars, thieves, and Marxists into our faces. I know that's probably paid for by Jeff Bezos, but I have never bought anything from Amazon, nor do I intend to either. If you…
2626th ranked -
Exception
January 6- 7 hours of frightening multimillionaire politicans and this administrations is spending millions of our Taxpayer money but MONTHS and MONTHS of riots that maimed first responders, poured paint on seniors, lasers in the eyes of police and firefighter, burning small businsesses, terrorising neighborhoods are there hearings, did someone in this administration suggest raising money for bail of the few rioters that were arrested. You are disgraceful for not having an opinion on the MONTHS of riots and for not publishing the truth about the summer riots.
4664th ranked -
AOL, Read your feedback
Fix your ridiculous censorship.
4664th ranked -
You can do a much better job of PROOFREADING your articles.
The headline across the video portion of the Bundchen & Brady story read as follows: Bundchen haa filed for divorce. Yes, it reads "haa", instead of HAS. Yes, readers, including myself, realize that there are times when grammatical errors occur, but, you folks at AOL far exceed the limit. You are grossly negligent in many instances, whereby your so-called "writers" use horrible grammar. There really isn't any excuse for this. So, please, clean up your act.
4664th ranked -
Check the grammar in your ads and news headlines.
Do you purposefully use incorrect grammar in your headlines?
2626th ranked -
WHY is there no appeal process for rejecting commentary after some organize together to have a contradictory point of view expressed?
There are those who actively attempt to suppress the free expression of opposing points of view. They contact each other and organize to object to EVERY commentary of someone they disagree with. AOL apparently takes their objections without review and then AUTOMATICALLY rejects every commentary from that member simply because of the number of objections or reporting. I can see rejections WITH specific violations of the rules BUT not because some weak minded activists can't simply respond to that which they politically or socially disagree. Meanwhile, those are simply ignored continue to appear regularly in posts that are beyond offensive…
4664th ranked
- Don't see your idea?