JAMES CHANDLER
My feedback
37 results found
-
21st rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
17th rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
12th rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
13th rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
14th rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
11th rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
16th rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
10th rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
15th rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
9th rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
8th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment JAMES CHANDLER supported this idea · -
7th rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
6th rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
5th rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
4th rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
2nd rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
-
3rd rankedJAMES CHANDLER supported this idea ·
I have to agree with Mr. Sheffield. This new format is carp. That's a step or two below rubbish. It has so many faults I can't begin to list them all. Number one is the change in how the page it shown. With this format you can't read what you are typing a reply or you can't read the original email in it's entirety. Admit that you screwed up and change it back or at least give your customers the option. I knew it was a bad idea when Verizon let you take over.