I accept that AOL is "free" at cost of exposure to ads however there needs to be consideration for those who are disabled with nervous system conditions particularly sensitive to excessive or chaotic stimuli such as that imposed by flashing ads. Online is now as much as in physical places, so it makes sense from this perspective to honor the human rights of the functionally impaired by offering them options to have ads only that do not flash etc. Otherwise such practices that prohibit access to AOL as a place online would be considered discriminatory, against protections at the highest level of law which is the United Nations Convention of the Human Rights of persons with Functional Impairment.