612 results found

1. Provide your tech supporters a QUIET ENVIRONMENT to work in. The men yakking in the background only exaggerated my hearing loss.

   Keep the background loudmouths quiet. Offer a quiet environment so subscribers can hear the techhies

   172nd ranked

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Community Guidelines

   PATHETIC...
   WITH ALL THE VILE AND DISPICABLE COMMENTS YOU ALLOW TO REMAIN ON THE BOARD...

   YOU REJECT THIS ONE!

   STOP IT!!!

   Your comment has been rejected.
   Replied toCarl 23m ago

   That's right, Carl...
   Let's throw the baby out with the bath water!

   Typical disposable society!

   172nd ranked

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Community Guidelines

   AGAIN... REALLY...!!!...???

   AND AGAIN...
   POST MY **** COMMENTS...!!!

   Your comment has been rejected.
   Replied toraahoo 8m ago

   ( … page 4)
   Their website includes a press release titled, “Committee Hearing Examines Fossil Fuel Industry’s Role in Climate Disinformation,” in which Dr. Isabella M. Weber, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Economics at UMass, Amherst confirmed what we all already know… that, “We have seen in the present crisis that profits are the ultimate and only goal of Big Oil corporations.”

   United Nations Secretary General António Guterres believes this state of affairs is abhorrent. In an article titled, “Amid world crises, ‘grotesque greed’ wins out” by Ishaan Tharoor, August 8, 2022, The Washington Post quoted him as saying, “It is immoral for oil and gas companies to be making record profits from this energy crisis on the backs of the poorest people and communities.”

   Speaking at the House Oversight hearing regarding skyrocketing oil company profits, Raya Salter, Esq., Founder and Executive Director of the Energy Justice Law and Policy Center stated: “We absolutely need to be looking at all of the significant ways that we can address inflation, and looking into where profits have been a windfall.”

   Recent Congressional efforts to limit price gouging with a form of windfall tax, face stubborn obstruction in Congress, with Republicans firmly against imposing such measures.
   (continued… )

   AGAIN... REALLY...!!!...???

   AND AGAIN...
   POST MY **** COMMENTS...!!!

   Your comment has been rejected.
   Replied toraahoo 8m ago

   ( … page 4)
   Their website includes a press release titled, “Committee Hearing Examines Fossil Fuel Industry’s Role in Climate Disinformation,” in which Dr. Isabella M. Weber, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Economics at UMass, Amherst confirmed what we all already know… that, “We have seen in the present crisis that profits are the ultimate and only goal of Big Oil corporations.”

   United Nations Secretary General António Guterres believes this state of affairs is abhorrent. In an article titled, “Amid world crises, ‘grotesque greed’… more

   172nd ranked

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Community Guidelines

   REALLY... !!! ???

   POST MY **** COMMENTS...!!!

   Your comment has been rejected.
   Replied toraahoo 6m ago

   ( … page 2)
   As per the Union of Concerned Scientists…
   In the article, “What Are Tar-sands?” posted Feb 23, 2016…
   “Tar-sand oil currently accounts for about 5 percent of all U.S. gasoline; however, it has a disproportionate environmental impact.” Producing a gallon of gasoline made from tar-sands emits “about 15% more CO2” than is released from a gallon of conventional oil.”

   Tar-sands also impact precious water supplies. The article states that, “Every gallon of gasoline produced by tar-sands requires roughly three times as much water as is used to extract conventional oil.” And much of that water is polluted by toxic substances harmful to human health and the environment.

   The Canadians for a Sustainable Society website, states that, “global tar-sand reserves contain as much as 167 billion barrels of useable oil, providing the potential for big profits,” however, since tar-sand is expensive to extract, they suggest that consistently “high oil prices help guarantee profits.”

   On the investment side…
   In their article, “Are Oil Sands Profitable,” the Society reports that the average Estimated Return On Investment (EROI) of conventional world oil is “about 17:1,” while the EROIs for tar-sand oil is “as low as 3.5:1… much lower than solar’s 8:1, or wind’s 15:1.”
   (continued… )

   REALLY... !!! ???

   POST MY **** COMMENTS...!!!

   Your comment has been rejected.
   Replied toraahoo 6m ago

   ( … page 2)
   As per the Union of Concerned Scientists…
   In the article, “What Are Tar-sands?” posted Feb 23, 2016…
   “Tar-sand oil currently accounts for about 5 percent of all U.S. gasoline; however, it has a disproportionate environmental impact.” Producing a gallon of gasoline made from tar-sands emits “about 15% more CO2” than is released from a gallon of conventional oil.”

   Tar-sands also impact precious water supplies. The article states that, “Every gallon of gasoline produced by tar-sands requires roughly three times as… more

   172nd ranked

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Community Guidelines

   REALLY...??!!

   Y'ALL ARE PATHETIC...!

   Your comment has been rejected.
   Replied toJim on the Coast 10h ago

   Poof!

   172nd ranked

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. make it easier to sign in for leaving feed back.

   I kept trying to leave feedback. It kept saying I needed to sign in. Then it did not want to let me sign in with out several tries

   172nd ranked

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. make easier to find support email so I can forward something to them

   AOL Member Services aol.customer.support@aol.comHide
   To nightwitch56@aol.com nightwitch56@aol.com

   ref:00D0PDfmX.5004U109ycj:ref

   172nd ranked

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Recover password using power of attorney

   Allow recovery of password with power of attorney, please. Mom is addled, does not do texts, seldom answers the phone. She is in Missouri, I, her daughter with POA, am in Colorado.

   172nd ranked

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. SECURITY BUG

   Hello,

   I found a bug on your website, can I get any rewards for these bugs, I know you do not have a bug program. Critical Vulnerability of His Web Server An attacker could use this vulnerability to attack your Web site. I am a security researcher and hacker, I have found many vulnerabilities on various websites. It is a great honor for me if my work is appreciated as a reward.

   Thank You

   172nd ranked

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Make flexibility/sync with older mail app versions that need generating passwords.

    There is always a problem with generating passwords from AOL to use in older mail apps. The service is usually not available. Please come up with a new way or make an app like Outlook or add the features like it.

    Limited features right now. I am sure you can come to some understanding.

    Thanks,

    172nd ranked

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Community Guidelines

    WHAT THE **** IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE???

    STOP IT!!!

    Your comment has been rejected.
    Replied toRecon1 2d ago

    Au contraire, mon ami...
    That's a common misconception, Rick... But it's not true! (posted for the 5th time, I believe!) The law you're referring to is provided for in Article 26 of the U.N.’s Asylum Procedures Directive (APD). The article “Asylum in the United States,” posted by the American Immigration Council on August 16, 2022, states that the U.N. 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol both declared that “Asylum is a protection grantable to foreign nationals already in the United States or arriving at the border who meet the international definition of a “refugee.” They define a refugee as “a person who is unable or unwilling to return to his or her home country.” It also pointed out that, “Congress incorporated this definition into U.S. immigration law in the Refugee Act of 1980.” Further, according to the U.N. Human Rights Counsel (UNHRC); "The Convention does not require refugees to claim asylum in the first safe country they reach, or make it illegal if they have passed through another safe country." A perfect example is the fact that a refugee from Bulgaria must pass through as many as seven different countries, yet they can still ask for asylum in England!

    WHAT THE **** IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE???

    STOP IT!!!

    Your comment has been rejected.
    Replied toRecon1 2d ago

    Au contraire, mon ami...
    That's a common misconception, Rick... But it's not true! (posted for the 5th time, I believe!) The law you're referring to is provided for in Article 26 of the U.N.’s Asylum Procedures Directive (APD). The article “Asylum in the United States,” posted by the American Immigration Council on August 16, 2022, states that the U.N. 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol both declared that “Asylum is a protection grantable to foreign nationals already in the United States or… more

    172nd ranked

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Community Guidelines

    REALLY...???

    Y'ALL ARE PATHETIC...
    AND REALLY, REALLY SAD!!!

    Your comment has been rejected.
    Replied to 9h ago

    Looks like those blinders are workin' really well for ya, Q...!

    172nd ranked

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Community Guidelines

    AND Y'ALL ARE HOLDING THIS POST... WHY???

    ANOTHER ONE THAT IS ON POINT...
    IT'S FACTUAL...
    IT'S INFORMATIVE...
    AND (MOST IMPORTANT TO Y'ALL)... IT'S "CIVIL"!!!

    SO WHY HAS IT BEEN HELD FOR HOURS???

    Hold on, your comment is waiting for approval.
    Replied toTom 3h ago

    I won't argue with your point in general, Tom...
    However, since I'm not a statistician, I can't provide a technical explanation of my own perspective, other than to say...

    Given the raw numbers...
    69% of drug conviction exonerees are Black
    They are eight times more likely to be exonerated for false **** convictions.
    And 50% more likely for false murder convictions.

    While I realize these numbers don't accurately reflect the entire situation... as you pointed out...

    I do believe they are evidence of a legitimate imbalance in our law enforcement and justice system!

    That fact is recognized by Chief Justice Roberts who wrote that “the law punishes people for what they do and not who they are."

    Which is clearly not the case!

    Unfortunately, that is not likely to change... as "the perceived link between race and criminality is so hard-wired in this country.”

    And due to the fact that we're obviously unwilling to have the pertinent and required conversation... i.e. discouraging and condemning the discussion of CRT, etc...

    It will virtually be impossible "to unmoor [racial discrimination] from our legal system”... or our society!

    AND Y'ALL ARE HOLDING THIS POST... WHY???

    ANOTHER ONE THAT IS ON POINT...
    IT'S FACTUAL...
    IT'S INFORMATIVE...
    AND (MOST IMPORTANT TO Y'ALL)... IT'S "CIVIL"!!!

    SO WHY HAS IT BEEN HELD FOR HOURS???

    Hold on, your comment is waiting for approval.
    Replied toTom 3h ago

    I won't argue with your point in general, Tom...
    However, since I'm not a statistician, I can't provide a technical explanation of my own perspective, other than to say...

    Given the raw numbers...
    69% of drug conviction exonerees are Black
    They are eight times more likely to be exonerated for false **** convictions.
    And 50% more… more

    172nd ranked

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Community Guidelines

    ALL JOKING ASIDE...

    IT'S CLEAR Y'ALL DON'T HAVE ANY SENSE OF HUMOR...

    PERHAPS IT'S "YOU" WE SHOULD BE AFWAID, VEWY, VEWY AFWAID OF...!!!

    Your comment has been rejected.
    Replied toMICHAEL 4m ago

    HA! That's good, TR... Be afwaid... Be vewy, vewy, afwaid!

    GET OVER YOURSELVES...

    AND STOP IT...!!!

    596th ranked

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Community Guidelines

    OH FOR CHIRIST'S SAKE...
    WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE!!!

    THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH THIS POST!

    IT'S ON TOPIC, IT'S FACTUAL, IT'S INFORMATIVE, AND... IT'S "CIVIL"!

    UNLIKE SO MUCH OF THE OTHER CR***P THAT'S ALLOWED TO BE POSTED AND REMAIN ON THE BOARD!

    AND... I CURRENTLY HAVE AT LEAST THREE OTHER SIMILAR POSTS THAT ARE ON HOLD, WAITING FOR YOUR DIVINE "APPROVAL"!

    HOPEFULLY THAT WILL HAPPEN WHILE THERE'S STILL A DISCUSSION GOING ON, AND THEY'LL NOT JUST BE LOST INTO THE ETHER OF AOL CONVERSATION "STOPPING!"

    WHAT IS UP WITH ALL THE OBSTRUCTION?
    GET OVER YOURSELVES...

    AND... STOP IT!!!

    Your comment has been rejected.
    Replied toROBERT 24m ago

    I couldn’t find anything about iPads, Bob...
    But you may be referring to the cell phones that ICE is using to monitor immigrants.

    According to the USA TODAY article, “Fact check: ICE program gives limited phones to immigrants for tracking, communication” by BrieAnna J. Frank, April 27, 2022;

    “ICE does issue smartphones with a pre-loaded app to some undocumented immigrants to ensure compliance with release stipulations. But the phones can only be used to access the app – they can't access the internet, load other apps or make calls. And use of them dates back to the Trump administration.”

    The article goes on to say that according to ICE…
    “The phones are used as part of ICE's Alternatives to Detention program, which started in 2004 and uses technology to ‘ensure noncitizen compliance with release conditions, court hearings and final orders of removal.’”

    But the devices have had all other typical phone functions disabled, so the phones are "solely limited to the functions assigned for the purposes of participation in the detention program."

    So, my guess is…
    You’ve been listening to sources that have a very biased agenda, which are providing you with a lot of inaccurate information… in other words… fake news!

    OH FOR CHIRIST'S SAKE...
    WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE!!!

    THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH THIS POST!

    IT'S ON TOPIC, IT'S FACTUAL, IT'S INFORMATIVE, AND... IT'S "CIVIL"!

    UNLIKE SO MUCH OF THE OTHER CR***P THAT'S ALLOWED TO BE POSTED AND REMAIN ON THE BOARD!

    AND... I CURRENTLY HAVE AT LEAST THREE OTHER SIMILAR POSTS THAT ARE ON HOLD, WAITING FOR YOUR DIVINE "APPROVAL"!

    HOPEFULLY THAT WILL HAPPEN WHILE THERE'S STILL A DISCUSSION GOING ON, AND THEY'LL NOT JUST BE LOST INTO THE ETHER OF AOL CONVERSATION "STOPPING!"

    WHAT IS UP WITH ALL THE OBSTRUCTION?
    GET OVER YOURSELVES...

    AND... STOP… more

    172nd ranked

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Community Guidelines

    THIS IS ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC...
    THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THIS POST...
    IT WAS ON TOPIC, AND WAS DIRECTLY ADDRESSING JIM'S POST!
    THAT IS CALLED A CONVERSATION...
    WHICH IS WHAT THIS BOARD IS SUPPOSED TO BE FOR... RIGHT!!
    BUT YOU SEEM TO REFUSE TO ALLOW THAT...
    WHAT'S UP WITH THAT???
    JUST STOP IT

    Your comment has been rejected.
    Replied toLOUISA 2h ago
    AND MY COMMENT WAS NOT TO LOUISA...
    IT WAS TO JIM ON THE COAST... WHY HAVEN'T YOU FIXED THIS?

    Please explain, Jim...
    Given that the asylum process was negotiated by the U.N. in 1957, and incorporated by Congress into U.S. immigration law in the Refugee Act of 1980”...

    How do you figure it was "intentionally flawed"?

    And yes, the administration knows the CBP does not have the funds to do an efficient job.

    So why did Republican Senators fail to support the recent legislation that would have provided those funds?

    Unfortunately, I'm not expecting an answer from you... because it appears you just like pointing fingers, rather than solving problems?

    THIS IS ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC...
    THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THIS POST...
    IT WAS ON TOPIC, AND WAS DIRECTLY ADDRESSING JIM'S POST!
    THAT IS CALLED A CONVERSATION...
    WHICH IS WHAT THIS BOARD IS SUPPOSED TO BE FOR... RIGHT!!
    BUT YOU SEEM TO REFUSE TO ALLOW THAT...
    WHAT'S UP WITH THAT???
    JUST STOP IT

    Your comment has been rejected.
    Replied toLOUISA 2h ago
    AND MY COMMENT WAS NOT TO LOUISA...
    IT WAS TO JIM ON THE COAST... WHY HAVEN'T YOU FIXED THIS?

    Please explain, Jim...
    Given that the asylum process was negotiated by the U.N. in 1957, and incorporated by Congress into… more

    172nd ranked

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Community Guidelines

    THIS IS PRETTY PATHETIC...

    ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST!

    REJECTED AGAIN... WHY, WHY, WHY...???

    Your comment has been rejected.
    Replied toJimmy 13h ago

    ALTHOUGH MY RESPONSE WAS NOT TO "JIMMY"...
    IT WAS TO "T-MAN K"... WHY HAVEN'T YOU FIXED "THAT"?

    “… many of them are breaking all kinds of laws from drug-running to sex-trafficking to plotting crimes and terrorism.”

    Man, did you buy into Trump’s rant and rhetoric!

    Trump Tower, New York, June 16, 2015
    “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best ... They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.”

    Not that that doesn’t happen, however…
    The percentage of crimes committed by illegal immigrants vs American born citizens is miniscule!

    Which kind of makes your point rather moot!

    THIS IS PRETTY PATHETIC...

    ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST!

    REJECTED AGAIN... WHY, WHY, WHY...???

    Your comment has been rejected.
    Replied toJimmy 13h ago

    ALTHOUGH MY RESPONSE WAS NOT TO "JIMMY"...
    IT WAS TO "T-MAN K"... WHY HAVEN'T YOU FIXED "THAT"?

    “… many of them are breaking all kinds of laws from drug-running to sex-trafficking to plotting crimes and terrorism.”

    Man, did you buy into Trump’s rant and rhetoric!

    Trump Tower, New York, June 16, 2015
    “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best ... They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with… more

    172nd ranked

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. CLEARLY state where and how we should forward very questionable phishing expeditions.

    Trying to get a fast email address to forward suspicious phishing emails is impossible. AOL seems to do everything so that it doesn't know about what's happening to real customers. PLEASE GIVE US AN UP_FRONT ADDRESS WHERE WE CAN FORWARD SUSPICIOUS EMAILS.

    172nd ranked

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Community Guidelines

    OH FOR CHRIST'S SAKE...

    NOW YOU'RE JUST EMBARASSING YOURSELF...!!!

    YOUR POSTING SAID...
    "Your comment was rejected. Why?"

    YEAH, I'D LIKE TO KNOW WHY...
    BECAUSE THERE'S ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH IT!

    SO, STOP EMBARASSING YOURSELF...
    AND START FIXING THE PROBLEM...!!!

    Your comment has been rejected.
    Replied toROY 36m ago

    You say tomato, Roy...

    I say tomahto...

    And in this case, I'm sure the twain shall never meet!

    It's a good thing to know... as we're all seeing now... that some tomatoes are just plain rotten!

    Glad that I, at least, am a discerning eater!

    596th ranked

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. Community Guidelines

    REALLY...???

    HOW RIDICULOUS...
    HOW DISRESPECTFUL...
    HOW UNNECESSARY...!!!

    JUST STOP IT...!!!

    Hold on, your comment is waiting for approval.
    Replied tobob 1hr ago

    So what you're saying Bob...

    Is that the state has the regulations on the books, but they don't enforce them...

    I say they may have them on the books... because they know it's the right thing to do, and it looks like they're doing their job... i.e. the "Do as I say" part of the equation...

    But they fail to enforce them because, as a conservative government, they don't want to "intrude"... which is the "Not what I do" side of the equation!

    Sounds like we're both saying essentially the same thing... just from different perspectives!

    And yet... the abuse goes on...!

    REALLY...???

    HOW RIDICULOUS...
    HOW DISRESPECTFUL...
    HOW UNNECESSARY...!!!

    JUST STOP IT...!!!

    Hold on, your comment is waiting for approval.
    Replied tobob 1hr ago

    So what you're saying Bob...

    Is that the state has the regulations on the books, but they don't enforce them...

    I say they may have them on the books... because they know it's the right thing to do, and it looks like they're doing their job... i.e. the "Do as I say" part of the equation...

    But they fail to enforce them because, as a conservative government, they don't want to "intrude"... which is the "Not what I… more

    172nd ranked

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close