spell check
Please give us back the Skip all option in Spell check in a document with proper names or items not recognized by spell check: You kept Replace all so why not Skip all!
And please all us to start spell check where the curser is: Since we cannot click Skip All we have to repeat every word we want to keep that you do no recognize which in a long email can be time consuming!
Bottom line after reading all the other suggestions, just give us back 9.8! When something isn't broken don't fix it! Gold is a disaster on so many levels!!
ROBERT HERTZKA
shared this idea
-
Kollengode
commented
1. In the spell check options in emails, I need the option "SKIP ALL" to skip all the words.
2.. i also need email folders t have nesting of one folders into another.
-
Anonymous
commented
It would be great if the spell check in email still included an ignore and ignore all option like it did previously.
-
Kollengode
commented
In the spell checking software, you do NOT give the option of "Skip All." This is annoying, to say the least. Say, I have the work Zbignew in 10 places in the e-mail, when I do the spell check, I need to click the skip button 10 times, wasting my time.
Why don't you have the feature "skip all" for God's sake? Every other spell check software has this feature. I am tired of suggesting this to AOL a few times. this was years before.
** S Venkataraman, PhD
-
Anonymous
commented
Amen
-
HOWARD CHAIET
commented
SPELL CHECK does not catch a lower case "i" which should be an Upper Case "I" or the lack of a Capital letter at the beginning of a sentence.
-
EVELYN MELLONE
commented
Great. So now we *can* edit our personal dictionary. That is an improvement, I agree. BUT this feature merely allows a word to be used without being underlined in red to say it is misspelled. It STILL will NOT provide the version we put in the dictionary as a suggestion to choose to correct a mistake in this personal word! All it gives in the list is the same suggestions it had before . . . useless.
Why should it be so difficult for AOL to restore this feature with the same functionality it had before?