Ok, the topic is abortion. I cant type "abort babies"
the topic is Joseph Weiner, and I cant type his name?
the topic is pedophilia and an arrest, and I cant type the word "pedophilia" in the comments section?

People seem to be able to post the phrase "black people" but yet "white people" cant be typed?

You cant type, "she's hot" even if the sentence was, "If the kid is in a carseat and she says she's hot, then obviously turn on the air"

You cant type, kill. killer, bombed, bomb, blow up, mass shoot, wipe out, or kill yourself. even if the story was about suicide ...oh yeah, you cant type suicide...
If the story is about a killer, we cant type the word killer? if the story is about someone who is a famous up and coming artist, you cant type, "this guy is about to blow up"

if the story is about science and I type, Lets say, I blow up a balloon" I get flagged for the term, Blow up

yet the phrase "do all the crime" and "do most of the crime" is allowed? explain a situation where one can use that unless its blaming a race, for doing crime or someone trying to defend it.

You cant type "preteen years." because apparently, "preteen" is only in reference to "***********..." which is ANOTHER word you cant type.

Mary Tyler Moore...**** Van Dyke... Blocked.
Due to the word *, and Dyke. So * Chaney cannot be typed. or **** Cavett Mobey ****. If we are talking about banning books, and I cant type that book,

Lets say the story was about a sports guy fined for saying *** to a player. And I type, "***" was originally a word for a cigarette and also not scene as negative, and now it is...so he should know better"
I get flagged. defending OR opposing.

the words Bullets, grenade, and slaughter. banned.
these words can be found in movie names. I cant type KILL BILL in a story about uma thurmand?

youre trying to hard to protect grown people's eyes. IF YOUR STORY CAN SAY IT, and we are not offended and hiding our eyes, neither should the comment section..

obviously youre tying to pull e demographic on aol as apposed to yahoo. aol is for GOP folk and you want to incite them to comment and dont want to attract Dems that might comment against them. I get that... but youre doing too much.

HERE WE GO AGAIN!
PREVENTING YOUR CUSTOMERS FROM ACTUALLY HAVING A CIVIL CONVERSATION!

GOOD FOR Y'ALL...
YOU MUST FEEL SOOO PROUD!

WELL STOP IT...!!! AND FIX IT!!!

Hold on, your comment is waiting for approval.
Replied toAl 12m ago

Again, Naire...
You missed my point!

And again; No facts = Opinion
While it is a fact that Biden stated he would nominate a black woman for SCOTUS... it's your OPINION that he did so at the exclusion of other, more qualified candidates!

That's the same complaint y'all had about how The Angry unChosen One's nominees were viewed following HIS announcement of specifically selecting conservative, pro-life candidates for appointment to SCOTUS!

Which is exactly what he did...
But was it done absolutely to the exclusion of other, more qualified candidates?

Then...
For you to accuse Biden of being "a single-minded racist"... says far more about you and the agenda-driven, "alternate reality" you live in... than it does about anyone else!

HERE'S A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF YOUR HYPOCRISY...
FIRST… IS THE POST ADRESSED TO ME...

FOLLOWED BY MY RESPONSE...
WHICH… FOR WHATEVER REASON… IS BEING HELD *******, WAITING FOR "APPROVAL"...

I HAVE NO IDEA WHY!

CORVETTE
Replied toraahoo 47m ago

Who made you the arbiter of AOL. Who are “(and others)”. Part of the delusion. I have read the opinions and am amazed there is even an ability to tied a pair of shoes. Save the nasty remarks for another platform.

Hold on, your comment is waiting for approval.
Replied tocorvette 12m ago

You accuse me, Vette...
Of attempting to be an "arbiter of AOL"... by making an assumption that there are others who think like I do...

Yet...
You have no problem negating others for allegedly not having "an ability to tied a pair of shoes!"

And then you have the audacity to say...
"Save the nasty remarks for another platform!"

Hmmm... here's a thought for ya (again)...
Back atcha!

HERE WE GO AGAIN!!!
YOU CALL IT A CONVERSATION BOARD, YET...
YOU DON'T ALLOW PEOPLE TO ACTUALLY HAVE CONVERSATIONS!

WHY NOT?

THERE'S NOT A SINGLE THING WRONG WITH THIS POST...
ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THE COMMENT IT WAS IN RESPONSE TO!

YOUR CONTINUED AND UNACCEPTABLE OVERREACH...
CONTINUES TO DISGUSTING, FRUSTRATING, AND UNACCEPTABLE!

GET OVER YOURSELVES...!!! STOP IT...!!! AND FIX IT...!!!

Your comment has been rejected.
Replied toJemima 42m ago

I find it hilarious, Bell...
That you're so totally unaware of what you're doing!

You made an incredibly extreme comment... for which I reasonably requested legitimate verification!

And you provided a YouTube video made by a 12-year-old that had nothing to do with the subject, nor did it provide any of the verification I requested!

And now...
You have the audacity to come back and criticize me for MY response to your ridiculous comments...

In which you continue to NOT provide ANY evidence of your original claim!

My suggestion...
Be willing to be vulnerable...
And just be honest...
With yourself, and with the world!

SERIOUSLY...???
RIDICULOUS..!!!. ABSURD...!!! UNACCEPTABLE...!!!
STOP IT...!!! FIX IT...!!!

Hold on, your comment is waiting for approval.
Replied toThe Bellmare 45s ago

In case you didn't realize, Doug...
Teachers are hired to educate!

Simply because a teacher has something to share that's not on the curriculum, doesn't mean they should not be allowed to at least talk about it!

I'm not suggesting that a teacher initiate an actual conversation about LGBTQ...

But they certainly shouldn't fear discipline or legal action if the subject should come up as a normal part of a discussion... which it certainly can... and does... in this day and age!

I doubt that child sex trafficking is not on any specific curriculum either... but teachers are certainly free... encouraged even... to discuss that issue with students, and provide insight and recommendations for how they might be aware of it and deal with it!

These laws simply remove a resource for children who have questions and concerns, and who have a desire to find answers and resolutions!

And just an FYI...
I believe your question is not just a question... it's your answer as well!

HERE'S ANOTHER ONE...
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH THIS POST... IN FACT...
IT'S A VALUABLE CONTRIBUTION TO THE CONVERSATION!
BY IN YOUR DISTORTED OPINION FROM HADDES...
YOU REJECTED IT FOR NO REASON!
FIGURE IT OUT... LET US POST...!!!

Your comment has been rejected.
Replied torsswalker 1h ago

All I can say is that research has found that following transition therapy, the male physiology has dramatically changed to the point that the biological/physical differences between a trans female and a cis female can be within the same range as the differences between different cis women.

Does that mean that trans females are never more physically capable than a cis female? Or that a cis female will never be more physically capable than a trans female?

No...

What it means is...
That there's as much likelihood that a cis female can compete equally with a trans female, as she would against other cis females!

The thing about competition is...
There are no guarantees!

ANOTHER ONE HELD ******* FIRST THING IN THE MORNNING!
WHY... THIS IS A VERY COGNIZANT CONTRIBUTION TO THE CONVERSATION... NOT A BAD WORD OR DENIGRATION IN IT...
BUT IS THAT GOOD ENOUGH FOR Y'ALL!
DISGUSTING AND UNACCEPTABLE...
DO SOMETHING TO FIX IT!!!

Hold on, your comment is waiting for approval.
Replied toUKnowImRight 1m ago

Did I ever say, Wick...
That "men can have babies?"

No!

What I said was that perhaps people are more and more beginning to realize that the world isn't the way we've always thought it was... and we're discovering new things about it... as we do every day, about all kinds of things... which includes that there's far more than the well accepted binary genders!

Did you know that researchers have identified as many as 16 different gender defining chromosomal combinations besides the traditional XX, XY male/female ones? What would you say that means?

That men can have babies?